With a recession likely coming later this year or next year at the latest, it is important to realize the causes so such recessions can be cured or even prevented in the first place. Enter Rodger Malcolm Mitchell, the guru of Monetary Sovereignty, penned this important and timely article.
He notes that every single recession and virtually every depression in history has been preceded by a cut in federal deficit spending, or worse, a federal surplus. That is not coincidence, since cutting the federal deficit slows the growth of the money supply, and surpluses actually shrink the money supply, all else being equal. (Federal deficit spending = spending new dollars into existence.) A growing economy requires a growing supply of money, and when the money supply fails to keep up with the demand for money for too long, the economy reacts by shrinking. Thus, barring a truly massive increase in private debt (i.e. more money lent into existence by banks) deficit cuts ultimately result in recessions and surpluses result in depressions or at least really long and deep recessions. And recessions and depressions can only be cured by increasing the money supply dramatically, typically by increasing federal deficit spending. That's it.
And this makes perfect sense, since GDP is literally nothing more than a money measure. To wit, GDP = Federal Spending + Nonfederal Spending + Net Exports. Kinda hard to grow that without sufficently growing the money supply as well.
Everything else is basically a sideshow, but that said, sometimes sideshows can be significant too. Take the current Trump Trade War, for example. This lose-lose, negative-sum game would have been recessionary by now had it not been for the massive growth in the federal deficit occurring at the same time, and eventually it may still cause the next recession in spite of the deficit. But if the Republicans decide to cut federal spending because of manufactured deficit hysteria, that will cause a far worse recession or depression, on top of the consequences of the trade war. And Wall Street recklessness can indeed cause financial crises, which of course can have knock-on effects on Main Street as well, as we have seen numerous times already. Though even that is most likely due to the fact that stock market crashes--or any other asset price crash--will shrink the money supply, all else being equal. And that is especially true when there is a "credit crunch" where banks suddenly refuse to lend as much as before, as we have seen in the wake of both the 1929 and 2008 stock market crashes (but not 1987).
What about oil and gasoline prices? True, 10 out of the past 11 recessions have been preceded by sharp increases in fuel prices. And that makes sense in a country in which oil is the lifeblood of the economy. But even this is more nuanced than one may think. Neither increases in interest rates alone nor increases in fuel prices alone seem to be enough to cause a recession by themselves unless such increases are truly extreme, which is very rare. But the simultaneous combination of significantly large increases in both (that is, a sharp hike in the Fed Funds Rate by more than 2.00-2.50% AND at least a doubling of crude oil prices within a year or two) appears to be sufficient to cause a recession. Of course, given how rare it is for recessions to not be preceded by cuts in deficit spending, it is not clear if sufficient deficit spending can be enough to prevent an oil-induced recession while interest rates are also hiked to prevent or cure inflation. But at the very least, increasing federal deficits will cure such recessions once the inflation dragon is defeated.
Overall, we know what causes virtually all recessions and depressions. That means we also know how to prevent and cure them as well. That is, when recession hits, or ideally before it hits, we should increase federal deficit spending, or at least refrain from cutting it. It's really not rocket science.
The concern of the federal deficit by Republicans is really hypocrisy. Republicans say they want to reduce the federal deficit but they support a massive increase in military spending and policies which antagonize other countries which then obligate that increased military spending.
ReplyDelete