Now you see why they were in such a rush to get Brett Kavanaugh confirmed despite the cloud of sexual assault (including attempted rape) allegations hanging over his head. But why the recent push to ultimately eradicate women's reproductive rights NOW? Why has it become so feverish, more so than usual? It is no coincidence that Alabama's draconian abortion ban was signed into law on the same day that it was announced that the birth rate, particularly the total fertility rate (TFR), had apparently dropped to a new low for the USA: 1.728 children per woman. Granted it is not the only reason, but the panic among both the religulous reich as well as the corporate oligarchy is certainly palpable, since capitalism depends on growth for the sake of growth, the ideology of the cancer cell that eventually kills its host, by the way. It's basically one giant Ponzi scheme, with patriarchy as its main protection racket.
What we are witnessing is a sort of "birth strike" by American women, and even men as well, particularly of the Millennial generation. Given the outrageous cost of living these days, and especially the cost of raising even one child (let alone two or more), lack of social support for parents and a fraying social safety net in general, stagnant wages, a hollowed-out middle class, and the massive albatross of student loan debt, it actually makes perfect sense. They are the ones who are actually thinking rationally here.
And contrary to what the naysayers may claim, that is actually a very GOOD thing on balance. The world is grossly overpopulated and in serious ecological overshoot, and Americans' truly elephantine ecological footprint per capita due to our massive pollution and overconsumption of resources only makes it that much more important to reduce birthrates in the USA relative to the rest of the world. And such grave ecological concerns greatly dwarf any social and economic concerns about population aging and other consequences of low birthrates. Especially since with a Monetarily Sovereign government like our own federal government, money is literally no object when it comes to things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and things like that--the government can literally only go broke if they choose to. And our addiction to economic growth is also part of the problem in terms of ecological sustainability, so that fear needs to be jettisoned at once as well.
In fact, one recent study finds the ideal TFR in terms of standards of living overall is in fact in the 1.5-2.0 range, basically the same as what the TSAP has long advocated since our founding nearly a decade ago in 2009. Yes, really. Take that, birth dearthers!
Of course, it is not all wine and roses either. The very same New York Times article that we referenced in a previous post does note that both women and men are on average having fewer kids than their own self-reported ideal numbers, primarly due to economic reasons. Part of the decline in fertility is due to Millennial women having more choices than previous generations, of course, but at the same time those choices are severely constrained by economics. Our nation has a truly abysmal record of providing paid family leave, high-quality childcare, and social safety net benefits in general compared to most other modern and even semi-modern countries. And in spite of increasing gender equality in many ways, the modern workplace remains both largely male-dominated and male-defined, and thus stuck in the past in terms of work-life balance. And while the perennial fears of low birthrates are largely overblown, it is still entirely possible that if they eventually fall to extremely low levels (such as Japan's 1.2-1.4 over the past two decades) and remain that low for decades at a time, we may very well hit a "pothole" on the road to sustainability. So there is still plenty of room for improvement in that regard, even if current TFRs are right where they should be. And besides, it is simply the right thing to do regardless of fertility rates and any concerns about such numbers.
If the pro-lifers and pro-natalists really cared, they would instantly advocate not only very generous paid family leave and subsidized (if not free), high-quality childcare, but would also support things like Universal Basic Income (UBI) to eliminate poverty (especially child poverty) while also (partially) compensating the unpaid work of mothers (and some fathers as well). They would also advocate better quality education from pre-K through post-grad, also free, as opposed to currently trying to kill the entire public education system via death by a thousand cuts. They would advocate better work-life balance for both women AND men, higher minimum wages, and especially shortening the workweek (what's the point of having kids if you are never going to see them?). And they would also advocate single-payer Medicare For All. But do you see them advocating any of those things? Of course not. Gee, I wonder why.
So can you really blame young people for effectively going on a (partial) reproductive strike given the world we currently live in? Of course not.
So can you really blame young people for effectively going on a (partial) reproductive strike given the world we currently live in? Of course not.
The best way to sum things up: Want us Millennials to have (more) kids? Give us a quarter-million dollars, then we'll talk. Because that's about how much it costs on average to raise a child from birth through age 18--and that doesn't even include college. And besides, our Mother Earth will truly thank us in the long run. Otherwise, silence is golden. Capisce?
The reasons why Milennials are having less children compared to older generations is indeed due to dire economic conditions in the U.S. While CNN and the rest of the mainstream media comment on how strong the U.S. economy is, they don't mention person's standards of living or the strong constraints of insufficient wages while products and services are highly priced. It's hypocrisy being practiced in the states where those laws were passed. Pro-natalism demands pro-natalist policies.
ReplyDelete