In fact, one recent study finds the ideal TFR in terms of standards of living overall is in fact in the 1.5-2.0 range, basically the same as what the TSAP has long advocated since our founding nearly a decade ago in 2009. Yes, really. Take that, birth dearthers!
Of course, it is not all wine and roses either. The very same New York Times article referenced in the beginning of this post does note that both women and men are on average having fewer kids than their own self-reported ideal numbers, primarly due to economic reasons. Part of the decline in fertility is due to Millennial women having more choices than previous generations, of course, but at the same time those choices are severely constrained by economics. Our nation has a truly abysmal record of providing paid family leave, high-quality childcare, and social safety net benefits in general compared to most other modern and even semi-modern countries. And in spite of increasing gender equality in many ways, the modern workplace remains both largely male-dominated and male-defined, and thus stuck in the past in terms of work-life balance. And while the perennial fears of low birthrates are largely overblown, it is still entirely possible that if they eventually fall to extremely low levels (such as Japan's 1.2-1.4 over the past two decades) and remain that low for decades at a time, we may very well hit a "pothole" on the road to sustainability. So there is still plenty of room for improvement in that regard, even if current TFRs are right where they should be. And besides, it is simply the right thing to do regardless of fertility rates and any concerns about such numbers.
If the pro-lifers and pro-natalists really cared, they would instantly advocate not only very generous paid family leave and subsidized (if not free), high-quality childcare, but would also support things like Universal Basic Income (UBI) to eliminate poverty (especially child poverty) while also (partially) compensating the unpaid work of mothers (and some fathers as well). They would also advocate better quality education from pre-K through post-grad, also free, as opposed to currently trying to kill the entire public education system via death by a thousand cuts. They would advocate better work-life balance for both women AND men, higher minimum wages, and especially shortening the workweek (what's the point of having kids if you are never going to see them?). And they would also advocate single-payer Medicare For All. But do you see them advocating any of those things? Of course not. Gee, I wonder why.
So can you really blame young people for effectively going on a (partial) reproductive strike given the world we currently live in? Of course not.
So can you really blame young people for effectively going on a (partial) reproductive strike given the world we currently live in? Of course not.
The best way to sum things up: Want us Millennials to have (more) kids? Give us a quarter-million dollars, then we'll talk. Because that's about how much it costs on average to raise a child from birth through age 18--and that doesn't even include college. And besides, our Mother Earth will truly thank us in the long run. Otherwise, silence is golden.
I wouldn't prioritize a TFR of below 1.5. I would have favor the welfare state outlined in this article. More than this, I favor women making their own decisions about having children. I will not favor any law limiting the amount of children women can have for environmental or for any reason. That's tolitharianism, plain and simple.
ReplyDeleteFor the record, the TSAP in no way advocates any form of reproductive coercion in either direction, period. That would indeed be totalitarianism, which we vehemently oppose.
ReplyDeleteGood.
Delete