DISCLAIMER: The following article references third-party sources and is intended for general information only, and is NOT intended to provide medical advice or otherwise diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, including (but not limited to) COVID-19. Consult a qualified physician before beginning any sort of treatment or prophylactic regimen and/or if you know or suspect that you currently have COVID-19. Anyone who takes or does anything mentioned (or alluded to) in this or any other TSAP article does so entirely at their own risk and liability. The TSAP thus makes absolutely no warranties, express or implied, and is not liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages resulting from any act or omission on the part of the reader(s) or others. Caveat lector.
What if the cure for COVID-19 already existed, not just recently, but for decades? What if the death toll past, present, and future could be or have been reduced to a mere tiny fraction of what it is and is predicted to be without it? What if it was such a game-changer that it would make vaccines and expensive new drugs obsolete, to say nothing of returning very quickly, seamlessly, and fearlessly to the "old normal" that we all miss so much now (that is, if we would have ever even departed from it at all)? And what if it consisted entirely of relatively safe and cheap generics and nutritional supplements all along?
Sounds too good to be true, right? Well, apparently it is true after all, despite all the best efforts of hyper-partisan lockdown enthusiasts, Big Pharma, and their government enablers to suppress and sabotage it. More and more doctors and scientists all over the world are learning about it every day, in fact.
First, let's define the term "cure" for the purposes of this article. We do not mean a "silver bullet" type of treatment in the same way that antibiotics singlehandedly cure bacterial infections, since this type of virus, like the common cold and flu, is really defeated by our bodies' own immune systems. Usually that does the job just fine, but clearly not always. Sometimes it needs a little help from outside. Thus, we define a "cure" as any treatment protocol that reduces the death rate and/or hospitalization/ICU rate dramatically (by at least 50%) compared to no such treatment, and can thus be considered a game-changer. Anything that can save that many lives and/or free up that many hospital resources would indeed be a game-changer by definition.
There is in fact already such a certain alternative treatment protocol that has gotten such a bad rap in the mainstream due to grossly improper use (and its infamous guilt by association with certain politicians who promoted it) that some countries and states have even banned it (or at least a key component of it) despite its rather promising effectiveness in saving lives when used early, properly, and under the advice of a qualified physician. For example, Switzerland briefly banned it and subsequently lifted the ban, effectively creating a natural experiment, and the results speak for themselves in terms of death rates (which rose fourfold during the ban and then dropped back to what they were before the ban when it was lifted). And the Brazilian state of Para saw death rates plummet after introducing it, while India's rather low per capita death rate (despite their epidemic being out of control for months) can also perhaps be explained by such treatment.
In fact, it seems to be one of the strongest factors in predicting a country's (or region's) per capita death rate, especially after adjusting for the average age of the population. Meanwhile, the presence or relative stringency of lockdowns generally shows no clear correlation and in fact, within Europe and within the USA, a rather perverse correlation with death rates.
So what is this treatment protocol? There are several variants, but the one that seems to be the best of all is the one developed and further refined by a group of Swiss doctors, and is as follows in their words:
Prophylaxis
- Zinc (50mg to 100mg per day)
- Quercetin (500mg to 1000mg per day)
- Bromhexine (25mg to 50mg per day)
- Vitamins C (1000mg) and D (2000 u/d)
Early treatment
- Zinc (75mg to 150mg per day)
- Quercetin (500mg to 1500mg per day)
- Bromhexine (50mg to 75mg per day)
- Vitamins C (1000mg) and D (4000 u/d)
Ancillary (prescription only)
- Hydr*xychlor*qu*ne (400mg per day)
- High-dose vitamin D (1x 100,000 IU)
- Azithromycin (up to 500mg per day)
- Heparin (usual dosage)
Note: Contraindications for HCQ (e.g. favism or heart disease) must be observed.
Addendum: Other prescription drugs with first reported successes in the early medical treatment of Covid-19 are ivermectin (read more) and favipiravir (read more).
So how does the whole thing work? This synergistic cocktail does the following, in their own words, with linked citations:
Mechanisms of action
Zinc inhibits RNA polymerase activity of coronaviruses and thus blocks virus replication. Hydr*xychl*roqu*ne and quercetin support the cellular absorption of zinc and have additional anti-viral properties. Bromhexine inhibits the expression of the cellular TMPRSS2 protease and thus the entry of the virus into the cell. Azithromycin prevents bacterial superinfections. Heparin prevents infection-related thromboses and embolisms in patients at risk. (See scientific references below).
See also: Illustration of the mechanisms of action of HCQ, quercetin and bromhexineThe Swiss doctors do note that early treatment is best, ideally before hospitalization, as is prophylactic use for high-risk and high-exposure persons. The sooner, the better. If taken too late, such as when already in critical condition, its usefulness is quite limited. But even if already hospitalized, better late than never.
So exactly how successful are we talking here? Again, in their own words:
Zinc/HCQ/AZ: US physicians reported an 84% decrease in hospitalization rates, a 50% decrease in mortality rates among already hospitalized patients (if treated early), and an improvement in the condition of patients within 8 to 12 hours. Italian doctors reported a decrease in deaths of 66%.
US physicians also reported a 45% reduction in mortality of hospitalized patients by adding zinc to HCQ/AZ. Another US study reported a rapid resolution of Covid symptoms, such as shortness of breath, based on early outpatient treatment with high-dose zinc.
Bromhexine: Iranian doctors reported in a study with 78 patients a decrease in intensive care treatments of 82%, a decrease in intubations of 89%, and a decrease in deaths of 100%. Chinese doctors reported a 50% reduction in intubations. Bromhexine is a mucolytic cough medication.
Vitamin D: In a Spanish randomized controlled trial (RCT), high-dose vitamine D (100,000 IU) reduced the risk of requiring intensive care by 96%. A large Israeli study found a strong link between vitamin D deficiency and covid-19 severity.
And if one still needs to be hospitalized, they go on to recommend that ventilators be avoided as much as possible as they tend to be counterproductive, and opt instead for the far less-invasive high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) to deliver live oxygen therapy.
(Courtesy of Swiss Policy Research. Worth reading in full from the original source.)
A word of caution about HCQ: While it seems to work very well when used early, properly, and under the advice of a qualified physician, that does NOT mean that anyone should just take such heavy artillery willy-nilly. Ditto for azithromycin or any other antibiotic. These powerful drugs can have serious side effects when taken improperly, excessively, or when medically contraindicated, which is why they are still prescription-only in most (but not all) countries even after decades of being on the market. Don't hoard them either, since plenty of non-COVID patients also depend on these medications as well. Don't take (H)CQ with any drug that prolongs the QT interval either. And unless you really, really want to win a Darwin Award, do NOT ingest any fish tank cleaner just because it happens to be related and has a similar name! When in doubt, stick with Quercetin and zinc, with of course plenty of vitamin C and D as well to further boost the immune system and synergize with the former.
(Quercetin, a naturally occurring plant bioflavonoid found in various foods, is readily available as a nutritional supplement in numerous stores nationwide and worldwide. The TSAP likes to affectionately call it "Vitamin Q". And no one would dare to ban that, of course, since doing so would just give the game away at this point. They'd rather simply ignore it and pretend it doesn't exist.)
And of course, for any critical cases, we know now (through clinical trial and error) that there are always corticosteroids to fall back on as well, particularly dexamethasone, and possibly inhaled ones like budesonide as well. Their effectiveness in saving lives is apparently good but limited. Given that they inherently suppress the immune system, they should NOT be given early, only for cases that are bad enough that respiratory support is needed. That is, steroids are used to quell the dreaded "cytokine storm" of severe inflammation that occurs when the body basically nukes itself in a desperate (and counterproductive) attempt to rid it of the virus. The fact that it took months to figure that out really speaks volumes. And it is practically the only thing that both pro-HCQ and anti-HCQ studies seem to agree upon.
(The jury is still out on whether early budesonide use specifically has any additional benefits.)
Also, please note that the TSAP is NOT a Trump-supporting party, in fact we despise him and want him to lose the 2020 election. But as we know, sometimes a stopped clock can be right twice a day in regards to HCQ, albeit with the truth being a bit more nuanced. And he could partially and belatedly atone for some of his misdeeds with the simple stroke of his executive pen, namely by passing an emergency use (if not permanent) authorization for the importation, manufacture, and use of Bromhexine. If countries as strict as the UK and Australia can approve it long ago for OTC use, surely we can do the same over here. And also, make low-dose HCQ OTC (or at least behind the counter) as well, like several countries already do, perhaps subject to rationing.
(And, of course, Trump can also use the Defense Production Act to force the production and distribution of PPE to hospitals, albeit belatedly, so nurses don't have to keep reusing PPE. And then he can go do us all a YUUUGE favor and RESIGN.)
In fact, we will go out on a limb and make the following extremely audacious claim: Had the United States government (as well as other countries) decided instead to avoid lockdowns and shutdowns entirely, let the virus run its course, and simply made all of the aforementioned drugs in this article readily available for free or cheap from the start to all those who needed them, especially for high-risk and high-exposure groups, while also recommending and providing the general population with vitamins A, C and D, Quercetin, zinc, et al., we would very likely have saved a LOT more lives at a tiny fraction of the cost. And of course, no collateral damage either. But that would have made far too much sense, of course.
Thus, the cure has apparently been right under our noses all along. It is long past time to stop playing politics and put it to good use, ending this nightmare once and for all. So what are we waiting for?
The True Spirit of America Party
Very good. You make a lot of sense. Keep up the work.
ReplyDeleteBe sure to view my blog from time to time. I give important information: https://waylandellis.blogspot.com/
Thank you. Will do :)
DeleteWhat do you think of that Australian website? https://www.21bethere.org.au/
DeleteIt is a movement to raise Australia's drinking age to 21. Thus, I consider it a load of bollocks, as they say across the pond :)
DeleteOf course.
DeleteWhen you say "across the pond", do you mean Britain?
DeleteCorrect.
DeleteAnd another update.
DeleteI just made a new update.
ReplyDeleteAnd another update as well.
ReplyDelete