CEASEFIRE NOW! With NO asterisks or qualifications. NOW.
To ALL sides of this war: the life you save may be your own.
(Mic drop)
For those who weren't born Republican, Democrat, or yesterday. We have one and only one agenda: liberty and justice for all. What's yours?
CEASEFIRE NOW! With NO asterisks or qualifications. NOW.
To ALL sides of this war: the life you save may be your own.
(Mic drop)
CEASEFIRE NOW!
And do all of the following:
The legendary Senator Bernie Sanders once again hits the nail right on the head:
The TSAP does not take a position on whether or not Iran "deserved" the attack. And granted, Israel as a sovereign nation has a right to defend itself from existential threats in general. That said, launching a preemptive strike on Iran while the U.S.-Iran negotiations were still in progress was NOT a wise move, and is at best a very risky strategy. And it is really, really reaching at best to claim "self-defense" for a preemptive strike in the absence of truly imminent danger. The case for that is about as strong as the case for claiming "self-defense" in a bar fight turned deadly that one had clearly provoked. Which is to say, not very strong.
And it has escalated from there since, of course.
And make no mistake, we unequivocally believe that regardless, this is NOT America's war, and we should NOT be dragged into it. Period. Inflaming it any further can VERY easily turn it into WWIII. America absolutely needs to engage diplomatically with both countries to help reach a peace deal quickly before this escalates any further still.
CEASEFIRE NOW.
You KNOW things are bad when The Notorious MTG suddenly starts to sound like the voice of reason!
(Mic drop)
UPDATE: On June 21, 2025, Trump went ahead and ordered the airstrikes of three nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, with bunker-buster bombs. Clearly, he is being reckless. We better HOPE that Iran turns out to be a "paper tiger", and that no further escalations will occur. Seriously.
CEASEFIRE NOW. On ALL sides. YESTERDAY.
In the wake of the still ongoing Israel-Gaza war following the brutal and barbaric terrorist attack by Hamas against Israel, and especially with all of the recent protests on college campuses and elsewhere, there has been an outpouring of antisemitism lately from both left and right (though largely from the regressive "left"). Some of it is ostensibly at least tangentially related to current events, while some of it is simply a "mask off" moment for longstanding hatred against Jews that has always been there but now has come to the surface now they have found a politically convenient excuse to hide behind. Either way, it is completely unacceptable. Regardless of how one may feel about current events, there is NO excuse for that sort of bigotry. Period. And the silence is truly deafening among those who should know better than to be silent in the face of it as well.
As we have said in the past, we the TSAP hereby vow to NEVER make that sort of mistake by either omission or commission, and hereby condemn antisemitism in the very strongest of terms, just as strongly as we do racism in general. And the reader is put on notice that we will NEVER tolerate any overt or covert antisemitism in our party, period, no matter how much one tries (in vain, by definition) to dress it up in any sort of leftist or social justice rhetoric. Bigotry by any other name still stinks.
Therefore, using any of the following red flag words, phrases, or references will get your comments promptly deleted, and severe and/or repeat offenders will be banned permanently:In the wake of the ongoing Israel-Gaza war following the brutal and barbaric terrorist attack by Hamas against Israel, there has been an outpouring of antisemitism lately from both left and right. Some of it is ostensibly at least tangentially related to current events, while some of it is simply a "mask off" moment for longstanding hatred against Jews that has always been there but now has come to the surface. Either way, it is completely unacceptable. Regardless of how one may feel about current events, there is NO excuse for that sort of bigotry. And the silence is deafening among those who should know better than to be silent in the face of it as well.
As we have said in the past, we the TSAP hereby vow to NEVER make that sort of mistake by either omission or commission, and hereby condemn antisemitism in the very strongest of terms, just as strongly as we do racism in general. And the reader is put on notice that we will NEVER tolerate any overt or covert antisemitism in our party, period, no matter how much one tries (in vain, by definition) to dress it up in any sort of leftist or social justice rhetoric. Bigotry by any other name still stinks.
Therefore, using any of the following red flag words, phrases, or references will get your comments promptly deleted, and severe and/or repeat offenders will be banned permanently:It has come to our attention that there is a faction in the USA and elsewhere of largely neoconservatives who are incessantly itching for a hot war with Iran more than ever. The casus belli this time (as though the warmongers really needed a new one) is 1) that Iran has long supported and funded both Hamas and Hezbollah, which is true, and 2) that Iran's fingerprints are (allegedly) all over Hamas's brutal and barbaric terrorist attack against Israel, which is debatable. That is in addition to Iran's alleged nuclear weapons ambitions, of course, which was the previous justification, as well as their proxy attacks against American troops in Iraq and Syria.
(For the record, we thoroughly condemn Hamas's brutal and barbaric terrorist attack against Israel, without qualification.)
That said, going to war with Iran directly would be a major strategic blunder for a number of reasons. First, a ground war and occupation there would be an even worse quagmire than the ill-fated ground wars and occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Secondly, even a predominantly air war, which could set Iran back centuries if we really wanted to, would ultimately create a "failed state" which would be a magnet for extremists in the future. The inevitable blowback sooner or later would be horrendous to say the least. As the saying goes, "you break it, you own it". At the same time, a half-assed war would in fact be the worst of all options in the long run, and any forcible "regime change" will inevitably create a dangerous power vacuum sooner or later. And finally, a war with Iran would be very likely to draw in Iran's staunchest allies: Russia, China, and North Korea, three nuclear-armed countries that any sane person does NOT want to get into a hot war with! That would be World War 3, essentially, and even if it somehow doesn't go nuclear (which is far from guaranteed), it would still be truly horrendous and extremely costly in both lives and resources. Any "victory" would be a Pyrrhic victory at best.
(Nuclear war is simply too horrible to even contemplate, something no sane person could ever support, period. But just one miscommunication and it can happen.)
In other words, the USA attacking Iran would not be like cutting of the head off of the proverbial snake, but rather more like a Hydra whose heads will keep multiplying each time one is severed. OOPS!
At the very least, a three-front war like that (without going nuclear) would NOT be even remotely possible to win with an all-volunteer military for very long. The Reserves and National Guard can only buy us so much time for what will likely be a very long and bloody war of attrition that would likely dwarf World Wars 1 and 2 and the American Civil War combined. That's the biggest elephant in the room. So for all the people who want to go to war with Iran (or any the other aforementioned countries), let's put it up to a vote. Those who vote "yes", well, greetings, you have just been drafted! Those who abstained will be next if needed. Those who vote "no" shall be exempt. And the vote should be repeated annually to decide whether or not to renew the war effort for yet another year. And if that is still somehow not enough for a truly existential war that already began and where withdrawal is truly not an option, and a more comprehensive draft is still somehow needed, then draft the billionaires first, then the millionaires, and so on. It's only fair.
With absolutely NO apologies to the modern-day Ayn Rand disciples who are itching to fight Iran, and yet paradoxically quail at the very thought of personally having any sort of skin in the game themselves.
(Normally I would agree that a country that needs a draft to defend itself deserves to lose, and that in any case they could easily have enough recruits for an all-volunteer military if they simply paid them enough. And in principle that still remains true. But a World War 3, due to its inherently massive scale and duration, would kinda be the exception that proves the rule.)
So seriously, warmongers. KNOCK IT OFF. Yesterday. Do everything you possibly can to defuse any impulse to start such a war. Yesterday. The life that you save may very well be your own.
QED